Associated URL: /news/680.html
![]() Terbium 05/14/2007 @ 22:32:16 EDT |
I believe that calls for a poll of the best fake phone-book name. |
Zirconium 05/15/2007 @ 08:41:11 EDT |
I think the best thing about that picture is the stick of Secret that sitting on that box that says PARTY. |
Lutetium 05/15/2007 @ 10:29:51 EDT |
In a situation like that, you just can't afford to sweat. |
Zirconium 05/15/2007 @ 10:33:21 EDT |
Maybe the "strong enough for a man" comes in. I wondered if feminists refused to use it too because of the sexist implications of that slogan. |
![]() Terbium 05/15/2007 @ 10:59:00 EDT |
I rather dislike feminists. |
Zirconium 05/15/2007 @ 11:01:50 EDT |
No, you dislike feminazis. You're ok with feminists. |
![]() Terbium 05/15/2007 @ 11:10:00 EDT |
Is there a difference? I get blamed for things I didn't do and everything I say to them ends up being a sexist male chauvinistic comment somehow. |
![]() Lutetium 05/15/2007 @ 12:09:02 EDT |
If you do a bit of reading on feminism, you may find yourself surprised. Of course, if you don't view yourself as a chauvinist, then you can count yourself proud to have peerage in a vast minority of men on Earth. |
![]() Terbium 05/15/2007 @ 12:44:42 EDT |
I believe this would qualify as femi-nazi. |
Lutetium 05/15/2007 @ 13:10:58 EDT |
Wasn't Hair and Handymen the sequel to Logjammin'? |
Lawrencium 05/15/2007 @ 15:38:41 EDT |
When I get directions to your home address on maps.yahoo.com, the address comes up as the location of "Your Local Handyman." I just figured that the people at Yahoo know about you what I know, and thanks for all your handy help over the years! |
![]() Lutetium 05/15/2007 @ 19:40:21 EDT |
"Men's Rights Organization?" *snicker* Okay. |
![]() Terbium 05/15/2007 @ 22:51:28 EDT |
If there is a Female rights movement would it not make sense for a Male rights movement? |
![]() Hydrogen 05/16/2007 @ 08:18:31 EDT |
I think that was called the American Revolution. |
![]() Lutetium 05/16/2007 @ 11:08:01 EDT |
Male rights movement : Religious tradition |
Hafnium 05/16/2007 @ 11:34:07 EDT |
You should read some of the quotes on that page. There are a lot of women out there who think all men are rapists. |
Zirconium 05/16/2007 @ 11:36:05 EDT |
I think "a lot" should be revised to "a few" or maybe "some" or "a vast minority." |
Hafnium 05/16/2007 @ 11:49:42 EDT |
With a large enough sample, 'a lot' of something can be a vast minority. "There are a lot of humans on the planet" is not proven wrong by pointing out that other animals vastly outnumber humans. |
![]() Lutetium 05/16/2007 @ 11:58:07 EDT |
I am aware of what those women believe and I've read some of their books; however, they are as effective at convincing the rest of female humanity in the same way that Fred Phelps is effective in getting support from other Christians. But they are useful for getting the rest of us thinking. Anyway, many of those quotes are easily taken out of their original contexts. |
Lutetium 05/16/2007 @ 11:58:58 EDT |
That list: 33 people. Earth's population: 6+ billion. Thunderclese: FTW. |
Hafnium 05/16/2007 @ 12:07:02 EDT |
You know that isn't a complete list, right? That's just a sample. |
Zirconium 05/16/2007 @ 12:10:04 EDT |
I gotta revise my glancing at things.. I thought it said Thunderclese: WTF at first. However, I am all bout me being FTW. |
Lutetium 05/16/2007 @ 12:40:44 EDT |
"There are a lot of women out there who think all men are rapists." The burden of proof on that statement falls on you. You've provided a list of 33 people. If it is a true 'sample', then it fails to disclose it's parameters. If it was "33/1000 people, when asked if all men are rapists, had this to say" then I'd say you had a sample, but really it's just a list of comtemporary quotes. I would also compare your "sample" with the number of people that claim to have been abducted by UFO's, seen leprechauns, and talk to dead people (a.k.a. Bombjoy's personal "standard deviation" list). Within that context, there are considerably more anal-probees then "all men are rapist" feminists. |
![]() Terbium 05/16/2007 @ 13:10:12 EDT |
Well see it depends on what your definition of alot is. When looking at trucks you could say 20 is alot or houses you own 3 is alot. Alot like infinity is subjective therefore can not be proven true or false. |
Zirconium 05/16/2007 @ 13:15:39 EDT |
I just looked up "alot" on Webster's website.. and it couldn't find it. However, "a lot" was in first place. |
![]() Lutetium 05/16/2007 @ 13:22:59 EDT |
However, Derf, in the scope of Americans being able to participate in democracy, the number of women who are as radical as the sample suggests aren't even concentrated enough to influence the politics of a little place like Mt. Pleasant, MI- let alone the entire country. To assume that they could somehow grow powerful enough without extreme scrutiny and then take away "male rights" would be tantamount to paranoid hand-waving. You have nothing to worry about; please, rest easily. |
![]() Terbium 05/16/2007 @ 14:20:24 EDT |
Im not worried. Never said I was. I just dont like them. BTW I thought it was a lot however that just didn't look right to me for whatever reason. Stupid mind and its confounded games. |
![]() Hydrogen 05/16/2007 @ 20:37:02 EDT |
I've always spelled it "alot" and pronounced it with a quasi-French type of "a-low" thing. |


